<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truecrypt Your Entire Hard Drive!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snubsie.com/2009/06/30/truecrypt-your-entire-hard-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snubsie.com/2009/06/30/truecrypt-your-entire-hard-drive/</link>
	<description>tech reviews, anime news, and teh life of snubs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Friedel</title>
		<link>http://www.snubsie.com/2009/06/30/truecrypt-your-entire-hard-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-5300</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Friedel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snubsie.com/?p=313#comment-5300</guid>
		<description>So I have a Dell laptop with TPM on it.  It says the hard drive is protected with a hardware chip to prevent it from being used on any other machine.  It has a pre-boot screen that uses a fingerprint reader.

My question is:  does that mean the hard drive is really protected, or should I still use TrueCrypt on top of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I have a Dell laptop with TPM on it.  It says the hard drive is protected with a hardware chip to prevent it from being used on any other machine.  It has a pre-boot screen that uses a fingerprint reader.</p>
<p>My question is:  does that mean the hard drive is really protected, or should I still use TrueCrypt on top of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
